Analysis of the Effect of Soaking Time and HCl Concentration on the Synthesis of Water Hyacinth Adsorbent

Authors

  • Siti Fatimah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Andi Rezti Maharani Chemical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Author

Keywords:

Soaking Time, Synthesis of Water, Hyacinth Adsorbent

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of variations in soaking time and HCl concentration on the characteristics and effectiveness of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)-based activated carbon as an adsorbent. Water hyacinth was chosen because it is an invasive plant with high cellulose and lignin content that has the potential to be processed into activated carbon through pyrolysis and chemical activation. The research was conducted by soaking the carbon in 5%, 10%, and 15% HCl solution for 1, 2, and 3 days, then characterized through water content, ash content, iodine absorption. The results showed that all samples met the SNI standards for moisture content (<15%) and ash content (<10%), but did not meet the iodine absorption standard (≥750 mg/g), with the highest value of 566.5 mg/g. ANOVA analysis showed that both soaking time, HCl concentration, and their interaction had a significant effect on the characteristics of activated carbon. The optimum condition was obtained at 3 days soaking with 15% HCl concentration. This study shows the potential of water hyacinth as an economical and environmentally friendly alternative adsorbent, but further optimization is needed to increase the adsorption capacity to standard.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Andi Rezti Maharani, Chemical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

    Chemical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

References

1. D. J. Prasetyo, E. Saputra, and N. Fitriani, “Iron oxide-modified water hyacinth activated carbon for hexavalent

chromium removal,” Environ. Technol. Innov., 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103098.

2. F. A. Naftaly and A. Takwanto, “Pengaruh waktu aktivasi mekanokimia dan penambahan tawas terhadap kadar air dan kadar abu adsorben zeolit,” Distilat: J. Teknol. Separasi, 10(2), 434–440 (2024). https://doi.org/10.33795/distilat.v10i2.4948.

3. F. F. Andarista, M. M. Huda, and R. Dewati, “Adsorpsi logam timbal pada limbah cair artifisial menggunakan arang aktif eceng gondok,” J. Tek. Kim., 18(1), 33–39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.33005/jurnal_tekkim.v18i1.4122.

4. F. M. Teshager, N. G. Habtu, and K. Mequanint, “A comprehensive study on the removal of anionic textile reactive blue dye using sustainable water hyacinth root powder adsorbent,” SSRN Electronic Journal (2022). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4018859.

5. I. Oktaviansyah, “Pengaruh karbon aktif tempurung kelapa dan karbon aktif industrial terhadap parameter ammonia pada Danau Sipin,” J. Redoks, 9(2), 137–146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.31851/redoks.v9i2.14541.

6. L. Cundari, A.A. Suhendra, S.R. Indahsari, M.Asnari, B.D. Afrah, A. Gunawan, and M.M. Alfatih, “Efektivitas karbon aktif eceng gondok (Eichornia crassipes) pada pengolahan limbah cair tempe,” J. Sains Teknol., 11(2), 403–410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v11i2.49422.

7. MIT, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), MIT OpenCourseWare (2024). Available at: https://ocw.mit.edu [accessed 27 May 2025].

8. M. Manurung, W. Widihati, and I. A. G. Yunilawati, “Arang Aktif Serat Sabut Kelapa Dan Aplikasinya Sebagai Adsorben Ion Kromium(Iii) Dari Larutan Air,” J. of Scinece and Apl. Tech., 54, 129–137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.35472/jsat.v6i2.1003.

9. M. T. Carneiro, A. Z. B. Barros, A. I. S. Morais, A. L. F. Carvalho Melo, R. D. S. Bezerra, J. A. Osajima, and E. C. Silva-Filho, “Application of water hyacinth biomass (Eichhornia crassipes) as an adsorbent for methylene blue dye from aqueous medium: Kinetic and isothermal study,” Polymers, 14, 2732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132732.

10. R. Hartono, A. Setiawan, and K. Wijaya, “Challenges in upscaling water hyacinth-based activated carbon production: A review,” Indones. J. Chem. Res., 11(2), 45–58 (2023). https://doi.org/10.22146/ijcr.76543.

11. S. Fatmawati, N. I. Syar, S. Suhartono, D. Maulina, and R. Ariyadi, “Arang aktif gambut sebagai filter logam berat mercury (Hg),” J. Ilm. Sains, 21(1), 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.35799/jis.21.1.2021.32908.

12. S. K. Shukla, “Agrowaste-derived polymeric adsorbents for water purification,” in Natural Polymers-Based Green Adsorbents for Water Treatment, edited by Elsevier Inc. (Academic Press, 2021), pp. 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820541-9.00003-X.

13. W. Maylani, Ismiyati, and Yustinah, “Efektivitas adsorben arang aktif kulit durian (Durio zibethinus) dan waktu kontak terhadap penurunan konsentrasi pewarna naphtol limbah cair batik,” J. Teknol., 15(2), 247–256 (2023).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31